Snopes.com, a Web site that aims to validate or debunk urban legends, fraudulent practices and other claims of questionable accuracy, did their part to support Big Money corporate interests by completely ignoring the existing backlog of independent medical research spelling out the extreme dangers of ingesting the harmful chemical compound aspartame.
The site gave aspartame a thumbs up and sided with the forces of hack politico FDA operatives (read: corporate lackeys) and careless corporate profiteers who have lied, distorted and concealed the truth about the harmful chemical compound. Citing a convoluted, confusing, inarticulate jumble of ostensible “evidence” as the basis of their declaration that claims of aspartame’s deadly toxicity are false, they appear to be joining a long history of lying, propagandizing and misinformation campaigning by the aspartame corporate money machine.
Acting decisively without any clear indication or even a cursory explanation of what led them to their sweeping conclusion, snopes proved itself guilty of horrible scholarship and highly suspect motivation, thereby reducing itself to just another Web site doomed to sink into a mire of self-generated meaninglessness.
Just a suggestion, snopes: If you want to make false statements about clearly demonstrated truths in order to invalidate them, have a better reason than a big, fat, arbitrary NONE AT ALL (or, apparently, one that you’d rather not admit to having). Here’s one more tip, while we’re at it: when millions of people’s lives and health are at stake, have the common human decency to do your homework, clearly state the basis of your findings, don’t make recommendations based on BS, and don’t just treat the whole thing like some dimwitted claims of abominable snowman sightings in Key West.
Way to go, snopes! Resulting from your laziness and morally irresponsible support of the corporate scumbags who lie, cheat, and are not hesitant about hurting millions of innocent people for big bucks, you’ve compounded the danger of aspartame, cast grave doubt on whatever decency you might have once had and reduced your site’s accuracy and reliability quotient to the ironic status URBAN LEGEND.
Way to drink the corporate koolaid, snopes (we hope it wasn’t sugar free).



October 3, 2010 at 4:45 am
No, why? Have you had one of your fake, inuendo filled and rumor riddled emails debunked? It’s ok, you can still believe every forward you receive as the gospel truth, if you want.
October 18, 2010 at 11:15 am
FYI. That ancient email has nothing to do with DORway. And Snopes does NOT make it clear that it’s debunking an email. It makes a statement that’s just flat out not true about aspartame.
Incidentally, we don’t allow links to diet products, so I removed that from your comment.
February 15, 2011 at 11:15 am
I’m guessing that Snopes used the FDA’s report on aspartame. If the FDA is not considered independent, then what research company is considered independent with results that aren’t influenced by either side. I try to avoid artificial sweeteners completely, so I’m not concerned about my health but I am concerned about others health. Henry
February 15, 2011 at 11:36 am
In light of the continual harm the FDA does to people in the name of protecting them, it’s very hard to have faith in their ability, or willingness, to look out for American citizen’s best interests. What they prove time and again is that they’re mainly interested in standing up for the financial interests of corporate lobbies. Whether that involves a deeply ingrained system of endemic corruption occurring at the highest levels of government and private business, is something everyone has to make up their own mind about.
For anyone seeking to find answers to that question, here’s a great place to start -
http://current.com/green/88795960_pbs-dr-david-graham-shows-how-fda-managers-tried-to-silence-him-for-indicating-vioxx-unsafe.htm
March 14, 2011 at 5:27 am
Thanks for sharing this information.. and i am really appreciating your thought,,